web analytics

Posts Tagged ‘Legal Research’

University of Akron’s Westlaw / Lexis Nexis Guide

We’ve been reading a bit about the University of Akron School of Law Guides for WesltawNext and LexisNexis Online Research (pdf).  Although Westlaw User Guides are free, I love the idea of  librarians putting these together for all the reasons articulated in the guide.  Of course, I’d not be doing my job, though,  if I didn’t point out the following correction:

Section IIA(2)In fact, Westlaw searches irregular plurals unless you use the pound symbol (#).  So, your search for “goose,” should deliver “geese.” 

and, the following clarification:

Section II Searching Concepts:  This section describes standard boolean searching on Westlaw.  There will always be room for traditional boolean searching.  Very often, traditional boolean logic is essential to complete a research task (e.g. how many times was the phrase “conceptual separability” used in the Ninth Circuit?).  This, you can do on WestlawNext.  And, I think it’s important for students to understand boolean logic.  So, without interfering with the pedogogical concerns of our librarians, let me say that I usually begin my WestlawNext research with a plain language query that takes advantage of the new WestSearch algorithm.  The benefit here is primarily efficiency.  If  I needed to know about the doctrine of conceptual separability, for example, I simply run the phrase in the search box:

and, this tip:

Section IIA(3)If you are using boolean, the pound symbol is also very useful for searching terms typically too common to be searched.  Using the pound symbol forces Westlaw to run a search to otherwise would prefer not to run. For example, if I’m often looking for variations of the phrase “before trial”, try, #before +2 trial.

//

wordpress visitors

DISCLAIMER
DISCLAIMERS: We’re lawyers but WE ARE NOT YOUR lawyers. Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice (because it’s NOT legal advice). Nor, is any communication within this blog intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Moreover, we make NO WARRANTIES relating to the information on this site including, but not limited to any warranty as to the correctness, currency, or accuracy of the information. While we make every effort to provide valuable, relevant information, readers should never rely only on information within this blog to make important decisions that might require advice of an attorney. Finally, we’re proud to be Reference Attorneys BUT the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the posting author(s) and are not the opinions of the blog editors, Thomson Reuters, its affiliates, or any other related organization.
Reference Attorney Research Guides