web analytics

Inevitable Disclosure of Trade Secrets – Hurd at Oracle

Hewlett Packard is seeking an injunction to prevent it’s recently terminated CEO, Mark Hurd, from joining the ranks at Oracle.  Finding cases where one party is seeking an injunction to prevent the disclosure of trade secrets is not difficult.  However, we regularly take questions regarding how to find cases where the court approves of an injunction preventing the hire of an employee.  One solution for this challenge is to run searches for inevitable disclosure or threatened missappropriation:

Database: allcases

Query: di,sy(inevitable threatened +4 disclosure missappropriation and trade-secret)

First result from query run today:

Granting preliminary injunction to enjoin former senior executive from working for direct competitor to protect former employer’s trade secrets from being disclosed in violation of Pennsylvania Uniform Trade Secrets Act (PUTSA) was consistent with generalized public interest in upholding inviolability of trade secrets and enforceability of confidentiality agreements, although there was public interest in employers being free to hire whom they pleased and in employees being free to work for whom they pleased. 12 Pa.C.S.A. §§ 5302, 5303(a).

Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella  2010 WL 2902729 (C.A.3 (Pa. (C.A.3 (Pa.),2010)

3 Responses to “Inevitable Disclosure of Trade Secrets – Hurd at Oracle”

Leave a Reply

Hurricane Sandy
Students: Login to lawschool.westlaw.com to donate your rewards points to the Hurricane Sandy relief effort.
DISCLAIMER
DISCLAIMERS: We’re lawyers but WE ARE NOT YOUR lawyers. Nothing in this blog should be considered legal advice (because it’s NOT legal advice). Nor, is any communication within this blog intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Moreover, we make NO WARRANTIES relating to the information on this site including, but not limited to any warranty as to the correctness, currency, or accuracy of the information. While we make every effort to provide valuable, relevant information, readers should never rely only on information within this blog to make important decisions that might require advice of an attorney. Finally, we’re proud to be Reference Attorneys BUT the opinions expressed on this blog are solely the opinions of the posting author(s) and are not the opinions of the blog editors, Thomson Reuters, its affiliates, or any other related organization.